Reflections on work-life integration post-pandemic: A perspective from pharmacy practice faculty.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of COVID-19 will have a lasting impact on how work is conducted moving forward. Prior to the pandemic, work-life integration and well-being were priorities for many organizations, including pharmacy. The disruption associated with the COVID-19 pandemic pushed businesses and organizations worldwide into an era of agility and flexibility previously unknown to the majority of workplaces. PERSPECTIVE: Increased remote work has presented both increased challenges (e.g., engagement) and opportunities (e.g., productivity). After a year of experience, this shift in the nature of how work is done has provided an opportunity to reimagine how and where work will be conducted in the future. IMPLICATIONS: Schools and colleges of pharmacy have an opportunity to re-evaluate how academic and practice responsibilities are accomplished in regards to work life-integration and management of concurrent work and family responsibilities. Administration and faculty should foster a culture of transparency on this topic to collaboratively incorporate methods that better facilitate work-life integration moving forward.

Pharmacy student perceptions of their preparedness to address vaccine hesitancy and refusal.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine hesitancy/refusal is a growing issue worldwide. Pharmacists are well suited to address vaccine hesitancy; however, the extent to which they feel trained to do so may vary. The objective of this study was to determine pharmacy student confidence in addressing vaccine hesitancy/refusal. METHODS: Students in their penultimate didactic and experiential years at United States schools of pharmacy were invited to participate in a 30-item electronic survey concerning perceptions of preparedness to address vaccine hesitancy/refusal. The primary outcome was pharmacy students' perception of their ability to address vaccine hesitancy/refusal. Secondary outcomes included student confidence in their knowledge of and ability to speak to vaccine controversies and support for pharmacist/patient vaccine responsibilities. Outcomes were addressed using five-point Likert-type items. Median values and interquartile ranges were reported, with chi-square analysis accounting for possible heterogeneity between groups. RESULTS: A total of 1433 students (estimated response rate = 20%) completed the survey. Respondents indicated confidence in their preparedness to address patient immunization concerns, hesitancy, and refusal with a median score of 4 (scale of 5, with 1 = the least confident and 5 = the most confident). Secondary outcome analysis revealed varying degrees of confidence regarding specific vaccine hesitancy controversies. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy students were confident in their ability to address vaccine hesitancy/refusal. Students held beliefs of responsibility for limiting non-vaccination, but felt less confident in addressing concerns regarding specific vaccine components and immune system overload.